Former CEO sues Parler over 'Arrogant Theft', website claims

Parler's co-founder and former CEO has sued the เล่นเกมส์สล็อตฟรี conservative social media platform over his firing this year. John Matze claims that Parler's leadership overtook his 40% stake in the company over the charges. The arrogant thief "threatened and bullied him with evictions he said were illegal and left him millions of dollars in debt.The lawsuit adds to problems on conservative social media sites since the Jan. 6 attack on U.S. government agencies in which pro rioters Trump spoke to Parlor. Shortly after the violence, Amazon Web Services refused to continue to host Parler, and the site went dark. Since coming back online But still not fully functional.Matze was unemployed after an altercation with conservative Rebekah Mercer that left Parlor unemployed.

He said Mercer was opposed to development policies to suppress a post on QAnon conspiracy theories, neo-Nazis. Violence and terrorism in the family Mercer was named a defendant in the suit.Parlor is now hijacked to increase the personal political and personal interests of the defendants, rather than acting as a platform of free expression as originally thought, "Matze's suit said.The suit, which claims to breach the contract and slander, named Jeffrey Wernick, Parlor's Chief Operating Officer; Mark Meckler, interim CEO And right-wing personality Dan Bongino is the defendant. No one has yet responded to the allegations of the case.NPR previously reported that Matze was stripped of his entire stake in Parler when he was abruptly terminated. But his lawsuit, filed late Monday, added new details to the fight through social networks favored by many Trump supporters.

After the attacks on January 6, Mercer "tried to jointly select [Parler] as a symbol or a 'spearhead' for her conservatism and planned to force Matze out," the suit said.The lawsuit reveals where Parlor's money came from.Matze and his college roommates founded Parler as an alternative to Twitter, with looser rules on incendiary speech.Matze owns 40% of the company; Mercer controls the rest.Mercer's stake in Parler was originally held under a holding company called NDMASCENDANT LLC, thus keeping her investment secret as appropriate.Mercer herself believes that her involvement will be a distraction and potentially toxic to Parlor's business objectives," said the suit.The series is the first to shed light on Parler's unusual financing.

Why did SkySilk come out of where to save Parler after Capitol Riot?

Suit, for example, said Mercer's funding looks like a loan that Parler will eventually have to repay.The same dollar as a 60% stake was claimed to be owed as well," it claimed.The suit claims Mercer suggested that her unnamed friend invested in Parler and valued the company about $ 200 million, a discount that was supposed to help her friend, but the suit Mercer said it had discussed with Matze that Parler should be worth it. At least $ 1 billion, which the company estimates is worth in public documents.Mercer did not return requests for comment. News of Matze's suit was first reported by the Las Vegas Sun.In the fall of 2019, Mercer was losing interest in Parler, the suit said, Wernick, an investor at the time, was accused of providing financing in the form of "Convertible debt agreements" through entities including Shanghai-based Dream Seekers Limited.

Wernick did not return requests for comment.The suit said it was Wernick's idea to tap conservative critic Dan Bongino to promote Parler.As a result, Wernick alleged Bongino had a stake. The suit indicates it is not clear whether Bongino has ever received the stakes.Around the fall of 2020, Mercer once again became interested in Parler as appropriate.She and Matze discussed the future of the company, but it turned out to be a disagreement over Matze's stake and how Parler should stay. In messages posted on the website The legal demands and the costs fall apart if he dares to challenge Mercer.After Amazon Web Services cut ties with Parler and after Apple and Google removed the platform from app stores, Matze said in a suit that he proposed a moderation policy, which would "It maintains the right to free expression for all angles but discourages content that incites domestic violence and terrorism.